Sacramento--Drivers in all of California's major cities are feeling the pinch of heavy traffic--on the road and in their wallets. The state's rough pavements cost some Californians as much as $778 a year in additional wear and tear, according to a recently released report.
In the report, TRIP, a national transportation research group, found that California--despite some progress--still rules the bumpy roads. Los Angeles, San Francisco-Oakland, San Jose, San Diego, and Sacramento made the top 10.
Riverside-San Bernardino, Oxnard-Ventura, and Fresno made the top 20 list of large urban regions (500,000+ population).
The big change this year in the Top 10 list is that San Jose fell from the top slot, for good reason. San Jose reduced its percentage of poorly rated roads from 66 to 60 percent in the last two years. Other California cities saw slight reductions or held the line on deterioration.
Nonetheless, rough roads are still the norm in California urban areas. TRIP found that while a quarter of the nation's major metropolitan roads--interstates, freeways, and other critical local routes--have pavement in poor condition, California cities on the top 10 list have 46 to 65 percent of pavements rated in poor condition.
Those poor roads create additional vehicle operating costs (accelerated vehicle deterioration, additional maintenance needs, and increased fuel consumption). In California's biggest urban areas, poor roads cost the average motorist more than $650 a year, and approximately $750 a year in the Los Angeles and the Bay Area. That compares with a $413 national average.
Four California urban areas ranked in the top five on cost: Los Angeles, San Francisco-Oakland, San Jose, and San Diego.
"The good news is California is making progress in improving freeways and urban roads, thanks to a serious commitment at all levels of government to address the problem," said Mark Watts, executive director of Transportation California, a state education and advocacy group for transportation.
"The bad news is now that we've made a down payment on our infrastructure future, our funding again is threatened," Watts said. "The state budget crisis, a possible reduction in federal funding, plus escalating construction costs will put a crimp in the buying power of California's imperiled transportation dollars."
Roadway maintenance and rehabilitation typically are funded through motor fuel tax revenues. "Gas taxes--state and federal--are not keeping up with basic maintenance requirements," Watts said. "There is a real danger of lagging further behind."
TRIP notes that a U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) report to Congress indicates that through 2025 the nation will fall short of the cost of maintaining current urban pavement conditions by $119 billion and will fall short of making significant repairs by $270 billion.
Federal funding for highway repairs and improvements in fiscal year 2009, starting on Oct. 1, 2008, may be reduced as a result of a forecast deficit of $3.2 billion in the Highway Account of the Federal Highway Trust Fund. Congress is considering providing additional highway funding to avoid steep cuts in federal highway funding.
According to the TRIP report, the continuing increase in urban traffic is putting significant wear and tear on urban roads all over the country. Travel on urban roads is increasing and travel by large commercial trucks is growing even faster than travel by cars. Vehicle travel in California increased by 27 percent from 1990 to 2005 and is anticipated to increase by another 25 percent by 2020.
